“COPENHAGEN – One of
the world’s biggest green-energy public-policy experiments is coming to a
bitter end in Germany, with important lessons for policymakers elsewhere.
Germany once prided
itself on being the “photovoltaic world champion”, doling out generous
subsidies – totalling more than $130 billion, according to research from
Germany’s Ruhr University – to citizens to invest in solar energy. But now the
German government is vowing to cut the subsidies sooner than planned, and to
phase out support over the next five years. What went wrong?
There is a fundamental
problem with subsidizing inefficient green technology: it is affordable only if
it is done in tiny, tokenistic amounts. Using the government’s generous
subsidies, Germans installed 7.5 gigawatts of photovoltaic (PV) capacity last
year, more than double what the government had deemed “acceptable.” It is
estimated that this increase alone will lead to a $260 hike in the average
consumer’s annual power bill.” – Germany’s Sunshine Daydream, Project Syndicate,
Bjørn Lomborg (1)
“The nation known for
its iconic windmills is throwing in the towel on offshore wind power, as Dutch
officials have determined the Netherlands can no longer afford large-scale
subsidies for expensive wind turbines that cannot produce electricity at
economically competitive prices.
The decision is a
powerful blow against renewable power advocates who have long asserted Holland
proves renewable power can be practical and economical.” - Dutch Pull the
Plug on Offshore Wind Subsidies, Heartlander, D. Brady Nelson (2)
Setting aside one’s political views in regards to taxpayer
subsidies and environmentalism, one must examine the situation of the two way cost where the taxpayer/consumer
subsidizes his/her own price increase. That is to say, when green energy is subsidized
by the taxpayer a first cost is incurred. However, the green energy firm which
has already collected a taxpayer subsidy goes one step further and lobbies for
their energy output to be purchased by utilities [purchase is
mandated/required]. The utility is then forced to buy the supply of green
energy output at above market green energy output price (other sources are available
at lower costs but the utility’s freedom to choose inputs has been curtailed).
The increased cost is then passed onto the consumer. Therefore the taxpayer/consumer has subsidized their own price increase.
Upon further review, the subsidization of one’s own price
increase is not the end of the story as the value associated with the
subsidization and consequential price increase purposely appear somewhere/elsewhere.
That is to say, beyond tax dollars of taxpayer A being spent to increase the
costs to the same taxpayer A when acting as a consumer, the taxpayer subsidy
and increase cost accrues as a benefit to an exogenous party(s). In other words, beyond the political dupery of
having the taxpayer subsidize his/her own increased cost, the cost becomes a
value to another party or parties.
Before one examines what party or parties benefit from the purposeful
political dupery one needs to consider third party intervention. That is, the
entire dupery process of the taxpayer subsidizing his/her own increased cost,
such dupery cannot occur unless a third party directs such dupery. The third
party dupery enabler is the politico.
Hence the politico-dupery-enabler with taxpayer dollars in
hand [subsidy] and the mandated price increase in hand, bestows the value of
the taxpayer subsidy and subsequent increased cost, the value thereof, on
another party. This exogenous party that receives the value is a process known
as dependent political constituency building through tax payer dollars. That
is, the politico bestows the value by building a voting block constituency that
is dependent on the politico funnelling now and in the future, the value items
mentioned above. Stated alternatively, the values of the subsidy and the
mandated purchase become the dollar conduit that allows the politico to build
and subsequently rule the dependent political constituency.
Meanwhile, a final step needs examined once the politico is satisfied
he/she has built a dependent politico constituency at no cost to themselves and
with all cost borne by the taxpayer/consumer. The “winner” [picking winners and
losers] is the party with the value bestowed upon them. This remote third party
gains the value not through competition, not through innovation creating a low
cost and valued item by the market place; the value was gained through politico
enablers aka crony capitalism.
